Huck finn7 Essay Example For Students

Huck finn7 Essay All youngsters have an extraordinary spot, regardless of whether picked by a cognizant choice or not this is where one can go to sort their contemplations. Nature can regularly give comfort by giving a supporting encompassing where a kid is compelled to search inside and decisions can be made untainted by society. Imprint Twain once said Dont let school impede your instruction. Twain expresses that this training which is given by society, can really frustrate human development and development. Albeit conventional training shouldnt be totally disregarded, maybe obvious beneficial experience, in the public arena and nature, are a key piece of advancement. In the novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain tosses the inquisitive yet guiltless psyche of Huck Finn out into a fraudulent, critical, and antagonistic world, yet Huck has one escapethe Mississippi River continually streaming close by. Here nature is introduced as an interesting domain when experienced alone. The stream is tranquil and quiet spot where Huck can return to look at any pickle he may wind up in: They went off, and I got on board the pontoon, feeling awful and lowThen I thought a moment, and says to myself, hang on,- spose youd a done right and surrender Jim; okay felt better than you do now? No, says I, Id feel terrible (p.127). Just half a month with Jim and as yet feeling extraordinary vacillation, Huck comes back to the waterway to think. Twain attempts here to tell the peruser how solid the horde truly is, and just when absolutely alone is Huck ready to settle on the ethically right choice. The characteristic streaming and quiet of the waterway cause this profound idea, show!ing how unnatural the aggregate idea of a general public can be. The biggest and most clear trial of Hucks character is his relationship with Jim. The fellowship and help which he provides for Jim go totally against all that sivilization has shown him; from the start this idea inconveniences Huck and causes him a lot of agony, yet after some time, through his background and imparted times to Jim, Huck goes too far maintained by the bigot South and comes to know Jim as a person. Huck is at a point in his life where assessments are shaped, and by developing on the stream, Huck can remain once again from society and structure his own. In the long run he ventures to hazard his life for Jim:And got to thinking about our outing down the waterway; and I see Jim before me, constantly, in the day, and in the evening time, now and then twilight, some of the time tempests, and we a skimming along, talking, and singing, and chuckling. Yet, some way or another I couldnt see no spots to solidify me against him, yet just the other kindI examined brief kind of ho lding my breath, and afterward I s!ays to myself: All right, at that point, Ill push off' (pp.270-271). After a long and intriguing experience, Huck comes back to the pontoon one last an ideal opportunity to choose the destiny of his companion. Emblematically, Huck settles on the ethically right choice away from all others, thinking on the stream. Despite the fact that it probably won't be obvious to himself, Huck makes the peruser see that sivilization, in their treatment of blacks particularly, isn't enlightened in any way. Each individual Huck and Jim run over appears to simply be tailing another person indiscriminately, as the entire nation were a type of crowd. In the last barely any sections, Tom Sawyer is re-presented and the peruser is left to inspect how various situations: sivilization and nature (the waterway), have influenced the childrens development. It is particularly apparent that Huck has ended up being the one with a reasonable and keen psyche, and Tom, in spite of the fact that he can disgorge useless realities about Louis XVI and Henry VIII, gives no genuine indication of development. The first occasion when I catched up to Tom, private, I asked him what was his thought, time of the avoidance?- what it was he wanted to do if the avoidance turned out to be OK and he figured out how to set a nigger free that was at that point free previously? Furthermore, he stated, what he had arranged in his mind, from the beginning, on the off chance that we got Jim out,

Grant And Lee: A Study In Contrasts Essay

As of late, there has been sufficient proposition considering General Grant and General Lee in contrasts. No big surprise, since they are the absolute most notorious figures in the new history of the United States. Both got military under the weight of family conditions. Both were exceptional members in the Civil war. In any case, the memory of Ulysses Grant is given from age to age while gravestones to Robert Lee are presently undermined with destruction. Let us go to correlation and study in contrasts lives of Bruce Catton Grant and Robert Lee. Ulysses C. Award was conceived on April 27, 1822, in Point Pleasant, Ohio. As of now at an early age, the youthful general was helping his dad on the homestead. In the wake of visiting a ton of non-public schools, his dad concluded that he should make a trooper vocation. On account of the appeal of Congressman Thomas L. Hemmer, Grant was admitted to the military institute in West Point, New York. Award complied with his father’s wishes, not encountering a lot of eagerness for the servicemen. In 1843, he got the patent of an official and began serving in the fourth Infantry Regiment of the United States. When of war against Mexico (1846-48), comrades’ comments about the extreme utilization of liquor by Grant have a place. After various alerts from his bosses, he surrendered in the mid year of 1854. In spite of the fact that his wife’s family had slaves, he found as right thing to battle on the association. Before long Grant for his accomplishment in the military field was delegated general of the detachment. After under his order the Confederates from Kentucky were constrained out, Lincoln presented on him the position of Major-General. Award was recognized by rationale, estimation, and persistence in directing military activities, and his soldiers indicated a high battling spirit. After the Civil War, Grant held the fundamental order of the US Army. In 1866, Congress gave on him the position of general. It was the war that gave Grant his place throughout everyday life. Being a War Minister, he has gathered broad administration experience, despite the fact that he was over and over reprimanded for ineptitude required for the most noteworthy state office. In the administration, general saw a chance to keep up a war triumph by reestablishing the political solidarity of the state and ensuring social liberties. Award won decisions in 1868 gratitude to the program that guaranteed recreation of the South, testimonial for freed slaves and monetary recuperation of the southern states. In any case, general in picking clergymen and guides depended essentially on the people he knew the tallness of administration. Promising a lot, Grant, be that as it may, was happy with the little. During his subsequent term, no measures were taken to determine social and political issues between races, so preservationist powers in the South picked up the advantage. Likewise, a general denied his underlying endeavoring to change the bureau of authorities, has figured out how to give presents just on his dearest companions. The degree of defilement and pay off cases outperformed all recently known. Analysis against Grant developed. The most enduring impact was â€Å"panic of 1873† when banks were shut, and the hesitant endeavors of the service couldn't improve dismal circumstance. Bungle, misappropriation and huge hypothesis quickened monetary downturn. After the finish of the presidential term, Grant left from legislative issues. The legend of the Civil War kicked the bucket on July 23, 1885, in New York. Notwithstanding military triumphs, throughout the entire existence of the US, General Grant alludes to feeble presidents. He was considered as a latent legislator who followed the headings of Congress, rather than actualizing his own thoughts. Dishonesty speaks to his legislature in a negative light. His arrangement towards the southern states is frequently surveyed as apathetic, as Grant all things considered attempted to ensure the social equality of the dark populace. One gets a feeling that he saw his administration as a sort of vestibule to political rest. In blend with naivetã ©, such disposition made a threat of control. Subsequently, a general didn’t legitimize the expectations that were set on him. Robert Edward Lee was conceived in 1807, in Stradford, Virginia. As his dad before long had genuine monetary issues, truth be told, mother raised the future general. In the event that Grant’s destiny was dictated by his dad, at that point Robert Lee’s life way was associated with monetary troubles. The main way out in comparable circumstance was to enter the well known military foundation West Point. Robert Lee, who was ingenuity in his investigations as well as an incredible physical power, could turn into a perfect official in the American armed force. Also, he became it. While learning at the foundation, Lee was probably the best cadet, not having gotten a solitary punishment from a higher order. In the wake of completing he was doled out to designing soldiers. In any case, the profession of a war engineer didn't give the ideal progression in titles. Furthermore, administration in the outback was troubled by an official who couldn't completely take part in his family. At long last, Robert figured out how to accomplish move to mounted force. At this point he was at that point 48 years of age. In 1861, Abraham Lincoln welcomed Colonel Lee to lead the land powers of government, as conditions in the Southern States warmed up as far as possible. Herewith, Robert was viewed as a persuaded adversary regarding servitude. In any case, being a local of the South, a colonel composed a request for acquiescence, focusing on that he couldn't take an interest in the attack of his country. The general, who is viewed as an image of aggressor slave-proprietors, for a long time saved a huge family for unassuming state compensations, and gained slaves, just acquiring a legacy at 50 years old years. While the administrator of the military of the North, General Ulysses Grant was a slaveholder. His â€Å"laborers† were liberated simply after the correction to the Constitution nullifying servitude came into power in 1865. Colonel Lee went to Jefferson Davis, the leader of the Confederation, and offered him his administrations as a trooper. Along these lines, Robert rose to the general’s epaulets, occupied with the formation of an ordinary armed force of the southern states. Lee partook in the arranging of various military activities and afterward headed the Army of Northern Virginia. Told by general, the soldiers made amazing progress. Respecting the northerners in the quality and readiness, Lee crushed them after destruction. His name has transformed into a bad dream for his adversaries. Robert Lee delighted in extraordinary regard from the rivals. Specifically, Ulysses Grant called him â€Å"Ace Peak†. In any case, in 1865 Lee’s armed force had to give in. The central government amnestied Robert Lee. He passed on in 1870, until an incredible finish occupied with the association of help to previous officers of the Confederation. For quite a while, benefits of General Lee were perceived by a ton of US nationalists, paying little mind to political convictions. The circumstance started to change not very far in the past when in America there was a â€Å"left-liberal† upset, communicated on an emblematic level in an inflexible refusal of memory of all agents of the Confederation. Along these lines, as should be obvious, General Grant and General Lee examination in contrasts outline show that they were in the best light just in the military field. Obviously, Ulysses end up being more fortunate than Robert. Yet, as we probably am aware, the fact of the matter is consistently on the victors. Lee’s hesitance to battle against the southern states vouches for his high good characteristics. All things considered, he didn't advocate the augmentation of subjugation, however for the freedom of the South. While Grant alludes to the kind of individuals who attempt to move their triumphs starting with one circle then onto the next, without adequate information and abilities. In such manner, General Lee is progressively legit, in light of the fact that he was occupied with a certain something, not professing to be an expert of governmental issues. Â

Public Sculpture in Paris Essay - 275 Words

Public Sculpture in Paris between 1700 and 1850 (Essay Sample) Content: The Point of Public Sculpture in Paris between 1700 and 1850NameInstitutionLecturerCourseDate Table of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc345326875"
Introduction  PAGEREF _Toc345326875 \h
3 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc345326876"
Rococo Art (1700-1775)  PAGEREF _Toc345326876 \h
3 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc345326877"
Neoclassical sculpture (1790-1830)  PAGEREF _Toc345326877 \h
7 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc345326878"
Conclusion  PAGEREF _Toc345326878 \h
10 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc345326879"
References  PAGEREF _Toc345326879 \h
11 The Point of Public Sculpture in Paris Between 1700 And 1850IntroductionThe 1700s saw a major revolution of public sculpture in Paris. The developments of public sculpture in continued for long until 1850 with major inventions and intriguing sculptures designed between these years. The development of pubic sculpture in 1700 was part of the Baroque Period that went on until 1750. Artists during the Baroque Period used scu lptures to express their feelings to their targeted audience. Sculptures were used to represent famous people in the French society among them leaders and beauty models (Laurie, 2002). It is clear that artists in this period used public sculpture to express emotions as their main objective. Some of the famous Baroque sculptors include Michelangelo and Gianlorenzo who designed works that depicted a high sense of emotion.Rococo Art (1700-1775)Rococo period was part of the late Baroque period that ended in 1750. Art and sculptures designed within this period were less formal and grandiose in structure. However, a majority of artists at this time borrowed some elements from the Baroque art. For instance, Massimiliano Soldan Benzi (1715-1730) did a bronze sculpture that incorporated many elements of Baroque art. One of such sculptures illustrated Christ being mourned by Virgin Mary and an Angel. Through the Baroque art, artists used emotion to display specific meanings in their sculptur es (Andersen, 1969). Baroque art was later replaced by Rococo style as artists wanted to bring deeper meanings in their works. During the 18th century, the Rococo art, which was mainly French, influenced sculpture and architecture.The rise of the Rococo movement was prompted by the death of Louis XIV who was the King of France in 1715. The Rococo sculptures were in existence between 1700 and 1789. One of the artists who specialized in Rococo sculptures was Etienne Falconet (1716-1791). Falconet was a specialist in erotic figures such as the Bronze Horseman monument. Some of the main qualities of the Rococo sculptures include informality and gaiety. Most of these qualities depicted concern for matters for the heart and certainly avoided seriousness (Horst, 2001). Concisely, Rococo art started as a movement for interior design decoration and women took the center-stage in designing such revelations. Among the artists who specialized in Rococo art included Francois Boucher and Jean-Hon ore (Andersen, 1969). Nonetheless, as Paris artists became more enlightened and inclined to the aspects interior design decor, women artists became more involved in the industry although they were not as outstanding as men were.The Rococo style reflected some of these ideological changes that paid little attention to the moral standards of the sculpture. Sculptures made using the Rococo style focused on aristocratic subjects and rarely focused on the subject of religion. As a result, some of the sculptures in this style were erotic while others were revealing and sexual. The sculptures influenced a number of moral aspects in the society and feminine sculptures became common in France, especially in France. Artists who embraced the Rococo style were perceived as more outgoing since they prepared controversial sculptures at times. They went an extra mile to have sculptures that were naked and revealing, which was an indication of the changes in the society in terms of art.Amusingly, a rtists using the Rococo style welcomed it because the style allowed them to have sculptures where texture could clearly be illustrated. Sculptures done with Rococo style had clear curves and were asymmetrical in nature. The point of designing such sculptures was a depiction of the milestones in art especially the aspect of freedom of expression. The artists who adopted Rococo style enjoyed the freedom of expression, as there were little ethical limitations. For instance, one of Watteaus paintings, Fte venitienne shows a garden setting with a nude statue at the background. This statue adds value to the painting as it is seen as erotic just like sculptures done by previous artists.Rococo style was popular as artists could combine rocks and shells to decorate their sculptures. The rocks were mainly used to decorate sculptures done in a garden setup, which was a shift from a Baroque art that used dark and light contrasts. Good color combination was used in the Rococo period to have te xture on the paintings or sculptures. In addition, the interior decoration adopted in the Rococo art employed many colors. The significance of such colors in the public sculptures developed at the time was a portrayal of beauty. Public sculptures in Paris that adopted the theme of Rococo arts were attractive and hence on higher demand. Defining figures using color other than just drawing them was an improvement from the Baroque art, and this led to an influx of artists interested in this style. By using erotic scenes in their sculptures, artists were able to reflect the feelings of the French people. However, the scenes attracted immense criticism from the church, which was against sculptures depicting sexual exposures (Horst, 2001). Although acceptable by some religions, Rococo art sculptures were not recommended for display in public places including Churches. This did not distract most of the artists interested in this style as they could display their sculptures or paintings in many other places away from religious centers.Watteau (1684-1721) played a major role in popularizing Rococo art although the movement had not received the attention it deserved. Watteau was responsible for developing the concept of individualistic art where artists were independent in preparing their sculptures. To avoid controversy, Watteau based his paintings to subjects that were not related to religion or other subjects that would raise ethical concerns to the audience. He proved to others that one could concentrate on simple subjects to develop art and still receive positive recognition in the society. Watteau trained Francois Boucher as his student (1703-1770). Based on teaching from Watteau, Boucher had most of his sculptures and paintings in Rococo style. He is famous for the Venus Consoling Love painting done in 1751, which illustrated the extent of freedom that Rococo artists had in expressing their feelings as it featured a nude Venus and her son. In this painting, Venus had her breasts fully exposed and wore a transparent cloth to cover her private parts (Levey, 1966). This brought out the concept of erotic and sexual nature of paintings and sculptures promoted by the Rococo style of art, but more importantly depicted the significance of art in this period, which was freedom of expression. Curves on Venus body were well-illustrated, enhancing sexual feelings although it may be argued to be morally unacceptable.Although most Rococo artists mainly focused on texture and emotion, there were others such as Fragonard (1732-1806) who were considered romantic in their approach. The texture in his sculptures and paintings are not real because most of his paintings lacked faces. Fragonard was one of the last artists to practice Rococo style as the French changed their attitude to issues of morality. As a result, the erotic subjects promoted by Rococo style started were perceived as unethical and lacked moral value. The style became unacceptable in French s ociety, and the French Revolution boosted its decline.Artists who made Rococo sculptures were able to carve sculptures that expressed their emotions well. As such, Public sculptures in Paris could be made to represent happy individuals and this could easily be illustrated by putting smiles on sculptors. Another away that artists used their sculptures to illustrate joy was by making sculptures that appeared to be in a celebrating mood, jumping or laughing. They achieved this by putting visible teeth on such sculpture and avoiding frowning faces. This was quite significant to the Paris society as it encouraged a happy atmosphere where people from different backgrounds co-existed harmoniously.Rococo artists were also associated with curving or molding sculptures that avoided seriousness. This was in line with the point of humor depicted by public sculpture. Such sculptures appeared to be putting on smiley faces, grinning, showing funny gestures with their hands or eyes, having big nost rils, or at times having big ears. When people viewed such sculptures, they got relaxed and tempted to laugh at times. Being a source of humor was therefore quite beneficial to most members of the French society (Horst, 2001). At times, most of the public sculptures in Paris were erected in public places such as parks, offices, or recreational centers. The sculptures in such places were used to improve the dcor and attract more people in such places.Another point of public sculpture in Paris was to honor significant historical figures. Some artists made sculptures representing historical figures of people who had participated in national duties or those who held senior leadership positions in the French government. Such sculptures were kept in national museums where many people could access.Neoclassical sculpture (1790-1830)Neoclass...

Similarities Between Christianity And Islam - 993 Words

Christianity and Islam are the two biggest religions that are present in the world today, with close to four billion followers combined. While Christianity and Islam actually have a lot more in common than most people think, there are still many differences to them. First, let’s start with the similarities between the two. Both religions believe that in one way or another, Jesus will return to Earth in the final days of the world to have a judgement day, in which essentially will determine if you go to heaven/paradise or hell, as both accept the fact that there is life after death, just different views of what exactly they think that life is. In addition, both Christianity and Islam believe in prophets, they both say that God sent prophets such as Moses, Noah, Abraham, and others. Another point is that both religions believe in the sovereignty of God. In both Christianity and Islam, God itself is the highest power there is, he is the sole creator of everything and that the wor ld that we live in is exclusively dependent on him and him only. One of the last similarities I’d like to note, and perhaps maybe the most important to some, is that both religions believe that there is just one supreme God over everything. Christianity, the followers of this religion, called Christians, use the Holy Bible and generally worship in churches or cathedrals. Christians believe in a soft monotheism and the Holy Trinity, which is where Christianity differs from Islam in that department, asShow MoreRelatedSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1316 Words   |  6 PagesIn today’s world, the largest religion is Christianity with a 33 percent and Islam coming in second place at around 21 percent. According to the article A Common Word between Us and You Both religions make up around half of the population around the world. Islam and Christianity are collectively known as Abrahamic religions because they trace their history to the covenant God made with Abraham in the Hebrew Bible. Christianity and Islam are two of the fastest growing religions, and they bothRead MoreSimilarities Between Islam And Christianity997 Words   |  4 PagesIslam and Christianity are two largely wide spread religions in t he world that have a great impact on their followers, especially in a spiritual manner. Because of originality, values, and unique believes in each religion, their believers respect and try to comprehend each other’s faith. With Christianity’s record 2.2 billion population and Islam’s impressive 1.6 billion population, they both form the bases of their countries laws and are recognized by governments all around the world. Even thoughRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1427 Words   |  6 PagesChristianity and Islam share much common ground. They trace their origins to Abraham; believe in prophecy, apostles, revelation, scripture, resurrection, and life after death. Christianity and Islam have related theological traditions; believe in one omnipotent God who is concerned with human salvation. Both religions are somewhat similar in how they embrace their beliefs; what the church is to Christianity, the umma is to Islam. Notwithstanding these impo rtant similarities, however, these two worldviewsRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1088 Words   |  5 Pagessignificant historic province where it served as the birthplace for many beliefs and religions such as Christianity and Islam. Within 600 CE to 1250 CE and 1st century to 1000 CE, Christianity and Islam began to spread. The two leading religions were very apparent in their belief in God and worship. As we seek to understand the Christian and Islam beliefs, it is important to be familiar with both the similarities and differences in the early years. The thought of death may terrify most of us, but to thoseRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1409 Words   |  6 Pages Christianity and Islam were both spread in socially and economically similar and politically different. They both had an important people that role and spread of the religions. Christianity included the individuals of who believe in Jesus Christ. Christians are the flowers of the Christ who often believed is the son of the God (â€Å"the father†); Christians strongly believe that Christ will return after the next life; the end of the world. Islam consists of individuals who believe in Allah, the godRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1005 Words   |  5 Pages Compare and contrast ancient Christianity and Islam. Christianity and Islam are both closely related religions, because they are branched of Abraham and other patriarchs mentioned in Hebrew Scriptures. Examples of these books are the Old/ New testament and the Quran. These books serve as their spiritual ancestors and are also know as Abrahamic religions. Although these books have a massive amount in common the clash of these two religions has caused for a mass crimes and violence across humanityRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam891 Words   |  4 PagesChristianity came about 2000 years ago and was founded by Jesus Christ. It is mostly practiced in the Western world with a population of about 2 billion people. The name Christianity came from a Greek word ‘Christos’ meaning Jesus Christ and was founded between 4 B.C. and 30 A.D, and consist of the 3 major groups which are the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox. Islam on the other hand was founded about 1400 years ago by Muhammad in 600’s A.D. The word Islam is derived from an Arabic word forRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1332 Words   |  6 Pagesreligion has its own goal, and their own path and belief to reach their goals. However, there are many similarities in beliefs. Although the followers of Judaism, Christianit y, and Islam may see things differently, they all fundamentally hold the same values and codes. To Islam, the Prophet Mohammad’s teaching is a complete and final revelation. On the other hand, according to the bible, Christianity believes that Jesus Christ is the true lord and savior that will grant you the access to heaven in theRead MoreSimilarities Between Islam And Christianity1928 Words   |  8 Pagesget punished for practicing religion. The two religions bear some superficial similarities, the differences between the two religions is clear though. How the two religions practice their beliefs, the population, beliefs, and how they view â€Å"Jesus† are different and similar. Although the two religions are very different from each other, they also show some similarities. The main similarity is that Islam and Christianity both are monotheistic; meaning they believe in one god. Which are 2 out of theRead MoreSimilarities Between Islam And Christianity1619 Words   |  7 Pagessimilar beginnings, Islam is a religion of violence and Christianity is a religion of peace and therefore is more beneficial to society. It is important to understand the similarities between Islam and Christianity, specifically their origins, to better understand their differences. Islam is believed to have been started through the descendants of Abraham, a man who was considered a prophet of God in both Islam and Christianity. Many historians and theologians agree that Islam began through the lineage

Summary of Durkheims Sociological Theory - 958 Words

Emile Durkheim is one of the major leaders in the delineation of sociology. Durkheim set out on a mission to define how sociology should be considered and how the method of sociology should be used. Although Durkheim’s writing does touch upon certain moral, political organization, and intellectual issues, overall, Durkheim sets out to provide a theoretical construction for the study of sociology. Durkheim desires to understand societal life through various social constructs. His agenda entails â€Å"accurately distinguish[ing] social facts† and further â€Å"show[ing] what it is that gives them their identity† (Giddens 52). He basically would like to analyze how societies work and what factors can be used to describe different aspects between†¦show more content†¦Durkheim set out to find theories and not answers to specific problems. The most basic question of sociology is concerning the factors that hold together society. Durkheim claims that â⠂¬Å"whatever specific mechanisms we find should all relate back to a more fundamental mechanism of which these specific mechanisms are variants† (Collins 186). Durkheim argued that sociology should be searching for this mechanism. He also claimed that he had potentially found such a mechanism which is the law of social gravity. As Collins notes, â€Å"Durkheim’s key explanatory factor is social morphology, the structural relationship among people† (Collins 186). Durkheim concludes that the society determines the individual, meaning that the individual is influenced by the society in which he/she belongs to. There are different variations in social density which â€Å"are the key determinants in every aspect of Durkheim’s theory† (Collins 187). Even further, Durkheim was interested in inducting the laws of all societies by studying more traditional and primitive societies because he believed that they were simpler and more capable of showing th e elementary forms of social life (Collins 183). Durkheim thought the key was to observe modern society through the lens of a more primitive, traditional society. Durkheim only wished to study societies and create laws to help cure society. He was not only looking into the history of society, but he was also looking into theShow MoreRelatedCrime Is Necessary: Durkheim’s Theory of Crime729 Words   |  3 Pagessociety plays a large role in our actions and Durkheim explains that reasons to which why crime is executable. Experts in the Department of Sociology have given their own words and critiques toward Durkheim’s theory. there are many theories of crime out there, but the most agreeable one is Emile Durkheim’s Theory of crime. The french sociologist states in his book Suicide that: â€Å"Now there is no society known where a more or less developed criminality is found under different forms. No people exist whoseRead MoreDurkheim and the Relevance of His Theories in Modern Society1240 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Treat social facts as things† is an expression that epitomises the works of Emile Durkheim. This essay focuses on four main sociological concepts proposed by the functionalist Emile Durkheim; the division of labour; mechanical and organic solidarity; anomie and suicide, and examines their relevance in contemporary society. Along with Marx and Weber, Durkheim is considered one of the founding members of modern sociology. He is also credited with making sociology a science through his applicationRead MoreDurkheim‚Äà ´s theories focusing on sociological methodology, division of labor and social solidarity1195 Words   |  5 PagesEssay 3 – Durkheim 03/29/2014 DURKHEIM: A SUMMARY OF THEORIES IN RELATION TO MARX AND WEBER Durkheim’s theories focusing on sociological methodology, division of labor and social solidarity The majority of Durkheim’s work is interested in society and societies ability to preserve coherence and rationality an period of increasing modernity. Throughout his work Durkheim was intensely concerned that society become a legitimate science, this is especially obvious when reading the book ‘EmileRead MoreDurkheim/Social Facts2127 Words   |  9 PagesStacey Seddon 10 January 2011 Social Theory (SOCI 101) Module Coordinator: Paul Jones Essay Question: Why is the concept of social facts so significant for Durkheim’s work? Illustrate your answer with reference to at least one of his studies. This essay will look at social facts and the significance of them to Durkheim’s work, Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) a French sociologist wrote a series of controversial monographs, showing the methods and subject matter of the new science ofRead MoreSociological Theory3361 Words   |  14 Pagesï » ¿INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY Compare and contrast the views of three appropriate sociological perspectives to an area of social life of your choosing. Why do we act the way we do? Does the mass media really affect the way a people in a society behave? Sociologists focus on the environment and the social aspects of human behaviour in order to answer questions like these when studying a particular society. A society is defined as a large social group that shares the same geographical territoryRead MoreBiography of Emile Durkheim1258 Words   |  6 Pagesteaching philosophy in 1882. Durkheim also wrote articles mainly on German philosophy and ‘social science’. These had received acknowledgment from Louis lizard, director of higher education in France, also a devoted republican. He was intrigued by Durkheim’s ideas on a scientific French morality. So in 1887 Emile Durkheim was appointed in charge of the social sciences and it was here than ‘Sociology’ first officially entered the French university system. He is commonly cited as the principalRead MoreIntroduction. Women Across The World Struggle To Make Their1454 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Women across the world struggle to make their voices heard so that today’s challenges can be an aspiration in equality for the future. To understand the struggle women are facing around the world, individuals look to feminists and conflict theories that empower and drive domination and oppression. Feminist theorists like West and Zimmerman, MacKinnon, and Smith defend women’s rights and call for an open and organized society that promotes equality for all genders, ethnic, cultural, and religiousRead MoreThe Significance for Economic Anthropology of the Work of Marx and Durkheim1557 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is the significance for economic anthropology of the work of Marx and Durkheim? Introduction The works of Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim have proved that they were indeed the finding fathers of modern social theory during the late 19th to the early 20th century. Along with others (i.e. Weber, Simmel, Veblen etc.) they had laid down the foundations of our understanding of the relationships that are held between culture and society on one hand, and economic activity on the other hand. Marx sawRead MoreEmile Durkheim’s Notion of Social Solidarity3007 Words   |  13 PagesEmile Durkheim’s Notion of Social Solidarity At the heart of Durkheim’s book of Division of Labor in Society is social solidarity. More than an increase in productive output, social solidarity is deemed to be the most notable effect of the division of labor. Over time, as roles become more distinct and appropriated according to one’s objective, the individuals in a society become more linked to one another. In fact, he tries to make sense of the division of labor as a phenomenon that contributesRead MoreComparison of Marx, Durkheim and Weber1622 Words   |  7 Pagesworlds and times in history, has had such familiarization not only for their respected times but a revelation to today’s systems and structures. Let us explore the minds and studies of the three men, and discover were they either Genius’ or foe? Summary: The â€Å"Manifesto of the Communist Party† by Karl Mark was first written in 1848 in a time where rules on workers and working conditions where at minimum to none. At the precipice of social and political turmoil in Germany, Mark writes â€Å"The history

Digital Disruption for Globalization and Technology -myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theDigital Disruption for Globalization and Technology. Answer: The world is said to be changing to be a global village (Karimi and Walter, 2015, 80). The reason behind that statement is the continuous growth of the technological invention in the world. Every minute, there are great minds somewhere inventing something that different sectors can use. One of the sectors that has really benefited from the technological invention is the business sector. Furthermore, thats why people invent so that they can earn a living and help the community at large to benefit from the invention. There will be forever inventions nowadays unlike the old days. Globalization and technology advancements leads to digital disruption. Digital disruption is the process by which new technologies affect the value of products and services generated by a certain company. It is a force that can never be stopped no matter what. It is a factor that is affecting the business nowadays. People are misguided thinking that digital disruption is negative, they are very wrong. If a busi ness fights digital disruption, thats the end of the company but when a business appreciates the trend and revolve together with technology, then the disruption will act positively to their market. When digital disruption happen, consumers taste changes hence customers will run to the company that will satisfy their needs. Case study The case study is based on the Kodak Company. Sometimes back it was the only and the leading photographic company in the world but later things changed (Bustamante, 2014, 820). The company enjoyed the merit of monopoly in the 20th century. It is clear that in the 20th century and during the company establishment, technology was way low compared to the recent decade. The Kodak company main products were filming, producing image frames, making of camera and printing among others. During those periods, the images that were taken and produced were white and black images or videos. The quality was way too low compared to nowadays. The cameras produced by this company were big and long. The images taken took sometime in the studio so that they could have been produced for viewing. Those days, this was the best such a Company could have done in terms of its products and services. Before the digital disruption on the Company, it was a beast and no other company had started producing its services (Downes and Mui, 2018, 00). According to the 20th century technology, it was the best company since no other film company produced the kind of services Kodak were providing. Thats the explanation why the company was on top. According to work centered analysis, there are the certain business process that were happening by then. The services and products were the best since there were no competitors. The company had customers all over the earth. It was one of the companies that enjoyed monopoly worldwide instead of just region monopoly. The clients and customers had no choice other than Kodak. Problems After series of digital disruption, the company experienced serious challenges (McQuivey, 2013, 00). When technology evolve, if a business does not recognize it, other business might adapt it and take the lead. The company forgot that the era of the 20th century was over and they were ignorant to know there were changes. Other companies like Sony took advantage and started producing cameras that were pocket friendly in terms of cost and size. The cameras that were being produced in the 21st century were producing images that were very clear and of high quality which took the color of the object. Kodak forgot that technology does not only change a company but also changes customers tastes and expectations. Customers seeing that the company was not producing the best, they shifted to other companies. Technology changes the business process of an organization. Technology changes the value of product and services (Productivity Commission, 2016, 00). All these brought problems to the Koda k Company. In the 21st century, the Company experienced major challenges on their services and products (Cunningham and Silver, 2012, 33). As indicated above, clients taste were changed due to technology and customers wanted quality. Customers wanted something better but the company failed to produce what the clients wanted. Clients shifted to other companies like Sony which gave better services than Kodak. Kodak tried to fight digital disruption which was not possible. One of the problems is that all their clients started going to other Film Companies. Customers are the primary aim of having a business. If customers started shifting, then their profit levels also reduced by a very great margin while their losses increased. The business processes were triggered but negatively since the company did not recognize one of the 6 elements of the WCA. Technology. In every business technology must change hence the business structure should be ready and flexible to change as technology advances, if that is not the case, then the business can only end up falling down (Doz and De Roover, 2017, 82). It is the year 2012 that the company was declared bankrupt and sold its assets to other companies which had appreciated digital disruption. The company ended there but tried to provide other kind of services. Recommendations There are certain things that Kodak would have streamlined to be able to hold its monopoly positions in the 21st century. One of the ways they would have changed is their reasoning. The management reasoned like half learned people by trying to fight technological inventions. In its decision to not change their products and to follow the olden ways, they would have invited people who are IT experts to help them see the important of appreciating the change. Their issue started the moment the Company tried to be ignorant and thought they know everything as they have always been doing. The management did not understand that people used their services because by then it was the only good services, if they went on with the trend of being the best they would have maintained the Company. Another recommendation is that the management should be reshuffled and be informed about technology (Bradley, et al. 2015, 00). The highest probability is that during the company failure, the management who were making the poor decisions were the same people who have been leading the companies in the old decades. They made the decision based on their past experiences without considering there are changes in business. If the management is reshuffled and be given to people who understand that technology has a very big impact to the business running, the Company can go back to its leading level since it already had a good reputation. One of the elements of the WCA is technology which affects all business processes and product value. The company should set aside some capital to establish an IT departments with all kind of professionals who can be responsible in producing products and services while at the same time giving technical advice and assistance. Today, things are changing daily, there is a high probability the IT team before in such a company were not equipped well since they failed to notice that there can be improvements in the services and product they deliver. The new team should be unique in terms of skill and innovation passion. Considering the current trend, to survive in the market, people need excellent products and services, if Kodak produces these services back, they can be ready to be giants again. Since change is inevitable, the only solution is to accept it and comply with the digital disruption. Implementation The recommendations can never be of use if there are no people responsible in reading and taking actions (Stewart, Schatz and Khare, 2017, 21). The main group responsible in the implementation is the management through the board of directors. They are the one that can make sure the people that were employed in the company are reshuffled and new put into place. Since they have witnessed the current trends, they can never ignore what is happening in the new world. The new management can be responsible in making sure, all the trends are well followed and the IT team is under the best management so that the CTO can always report back to the management on the current issues and what should be done and what shouldnt be done. It was also the work of the IT department to make sure they deliver the best (Sullivan, et al. 2016, 386). In such a company, these guys are the backbones. Whatever they deliver can make the company raise or fall. They should be under a good CTO who can really motivates his and her employees to come up with projects that can hit the market and reduce competition or if possible eliminate the competition. The better the products and services, the higher the number of customers and the higher the profit margins. In conclusion, digital disruption can either be positive or negative (Weill and Woerner. 2016, 66). It all depends on how the business welcomes the new inventions. If a business tries to fight the new technology then failure began from that point and the vice versa is true. Kodak being a monopoly for a very long period forgot that they can try and fight the new technology but they can never control the consumers interest while they operate in the past. Digital disruptions changes consumer tastes and expectations. The recommendations should be implemented by the concerned parties to help the organization rise again. All the elements of the WCA matters and if any is ignored, it can lead to the failure of the whole business. References Bradley, J., Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., Noronha, A. and Wade, M., 2015. Digital vortex: How digital disruption is redefining industries.Global Center for Digital Business Transformation: An IMD and Cisco initiative. Bustamante, E., 2014. Cultural industries in the digital age: some provisional conclusions.Media, Culture Society,26(6), pp.803-820. Cunningham, S.D. and Silver, J., 2012. On-line film distribution: Its history and global complexion. InDigital Disruption: Cinema Moves Online(pp. 33-66). St Andrews Film Studies, University of St Andrews. Downes, L. and Mui, C., 2018. Unleashing the killer app: digital strategies for market.Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA. Doz, Y.L. and De Roover, B., 2017. Responding to Digital Disruption Through Alliances. Gilbert, R.J., 2015. E-books: A tale of digital disruption.Journal of Economic Perspectives,29(3), pp.165-84. Karimi, J. and Walter, Z., 2015. The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry.Journal of Management Information Systems,32(1), pp.39-81. McQuivey, J., 2013. Digital disruption: Unleashing the next wave of innovation. Productivity Commission, 2016. Digital Disruption: What do governments need to do?, Commission Research Paper, Canberra. Stewart, B., Schatz, R. and Khare, A., 2017. Making Sense of Digital Disruption Using a Conceptual Two-Order Model. InPhantom Ex Machina(pp. 3-21). Springer, Cham. Sullivan, C., Staib, A., Ayre, S., Daly, M., Collins, R., Draheim, M. and Ashby, R., 2016. Pioneering digital disruption: Australias first integrated digital tertiary hospital.The Medical journal of Australia,205(9), pp.386-389. Weill, P. and Woerner, S.L., 2016. Becoming better prepared for digital disruption.NACD Directorship, Washington, DC. March/April, pp.64-66.a

Romeo And Juliet Tragic Essays - Characters In Romeo And Juliet

Romeo And Juliet Tragic It is known that in Shakespeare's tragedies main characters die in the end, and in his comedies people marry. Since Romeo and Juliet are a tragedy, Romeo and Juliet are going to die in the end. Some events have to lead to their deaths, and someone makes these events happen. The person(s) who started it all and did something that led to all the other events that caused the death of "a pair of star-crossed lovers". The Capulets and Montagues would be most responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet because if their ancestors didn't start the fighting, and they didn't continue it, nothing terrible would have happened. The first lines of the book tell us about the hate and envy between the two houses. Choir: "Two households, both alike in dignity, From ancient grudge to new mutiny,". The choir tells us that the whole conflict started a long time ago with really little things, and then grew into huge fights involving many people. No leader of either household ever though about making peace, they were all too busy to spoil everything for the rival family. Only after the death of their children they realized how wrong they were. Romeo and Juliet first meet each other at a party at the Capulets' house. They fall in love with each other at the first sight without knowing that they are from rival houses, and when they do learn about it, it is too late. Juliet says: "My only love, sprung from my only hate! Too early seen unknown, and known too late!". Juliet realizes that it was a mistake to fall in love with Romeo, because he is one of the people she should watch out for. He is her first and only love, but he is an enemy of her family. Luckily for Romeo, Juliet is smart, and such dumb thing as unreasonable hate between their parents wouldn't stop her from loving Romeo and getting married with him. She is sorry that their families are enemies, though, because everything would be much easier if they weren't. So this is the first time when the hate between Capulets and Montagues becomes an obstacle to Romeo and Juliet's happiness. Only after their children die, do the Montague and Capulet come to their senses? The Prince accuses them of killing Romeo and Juliet: " . . . Capulet, Montague, See what a scourge is laid upon your hate, That heavens finds means to kill your joys with love!". The Prince makes them see how wrong they were all the time, that all because of their hate, because they couldn't let their children love each other, Romeo and Juliet died. After that, Capulet and Montague make peace, and Montague even says that he will make a gold statue of Juliet, but what is that going to do, it is too late, nothing will bring their children back. It is totally Capulets' and Montagues' fault that Romeo and Juliet died. If they didn't hate each other so much, they would let their children marry, and they would be able to live happily ever after. There was only one person that realized how unreasonable the fighting was and even tried to stop it, and he was Benvolio. Benvolio was a Montague, but the Capulets didn't have a peacemaker such as Benvolio. They only had Tybalt, whose only goal was to destroy all the Montagues. Also we don't really know how Romeo and Juliet's parents would have reacted if they had known that their children love each other. Romeo and Juliet didn't even try to tell them about love between them because they were afraid that their parents wouldn't understand them, but maybe they would. The problem is, we don't know, because Capulet and Montague learned about their children's love when they were already dead. It is still mostly Capulets' and Montagues' fault that Romeo and Juliet died, but maybe it was just their fate to die. Romeo and Juliet A Tragic Play It is known that in Shakespeare's tragedies main characters die in the end, and in his comedies people marry. Since Romeo and Juliet are a tragedy, Romeo and Juliet are going to die in the end. Some events have to lead to their deaths, and someone makes these events happen. The person(s) who started it all and did something that led to all the other events that caused the death of "a pair of star-crossed lovers". The Capulets and Montagues would be most responsible for